Home » Common Cents » Currently Reading:

Local Impact of Proposed Education Aid Changes

When the House of Representatives meets on Wednesday, the chief topic of debate will be the state budget and, in particular, the House Finance Committee’s proposed amendments to HB 1 and HB 2, the two bills that comprise New Hampshire’s revenue and spending plan for FY 2016-2017.

Those amendments will not be the only ones up for consideration, however. Among the additional changes that may be considered on the House floor are further modifications to the way in which education aid to local districts will be distributed in FY 2017.

All told, the version of the state budget approved by the House Finance Committee last week would reduce the amount of adequate education aid to be distributed in FY 2017 by approximately $33 million, relative to current law. That reduction, in turn, is the result of two separate changes to the formula determining the amount of aid each community receives. First, the budget put forward by the Committee would eliminate the statutory cap on the increase any one district can receive in adequacy aid from one year to the next. This would mean that some districts would see an increase in FY 2017 beyond what they could expect to receive under current law. The second, and more sizable, change found in the Committee’s budget proposal is a reduction in the so-called “stabilization” grants communities are scheduled to receive; under the Committee’s plan, those grants would be reduced by either 40 percent or $750,000, whichever is less. In aggregate terms, this reduction in stabilization grants would amount to approximately 28 percent or about $44 million relative to current law.

Some Representatives have suggested simply reducing stabilization funds for every community by approximately 28 percent, thus yielding the same $44 million reduction relative to current law, but not limiting the impact at a set dollar figure.

The table below, based upon a preliminary analysis by the Office of the Legislative Budget Assistant (LBA), attempts to assess the impact of these two approaches on New Hampshire’s cities and towns. (The table excludes the fifteen unincorporated places found in the LBA’s original analysis.) It suggests that the two approaches would result in education aid reductions for roughly the same number of communities, but that the majority of communities would experience smaller reductions under the 28 percent across-the-board approach. Importantly, though, there are a dozen communities that would be adversely affected by the removal of the $750,000 limit included in the Committee’s initial proposal. Among that dozen are some of the largest cities and towns in the state, including Manchester, Nashua, Derry, and Keene.

 

Impact of Education Aid Changes - I

 

Impact of Education Aid Changes - II

 

Impact of Education Aid Changes - III

 

Impact of Education Aid Changes - IV

 

Impact of Education Aid Changes - V

 

Connect with NHFPI

NHFPI’s 5th Annual Policy Conference

NHFPI Policy Conference

Common Cents Blog

Expanded Medicaid Proposal Moves Forward with Changes to Work Requirements

11 Apr 2018

tree with coins

On April 5, the New Hampshire House of Representatives passed an amended version of expanded Medicaid reauthorization that modifies the work requirements outlined in the State Senate’s proposal and makes a variety of other, smaller changes. The House accepted the amendment from the House Health, Human Services, and Elderly Affairs Committee and voted to move the bill to the House Finance Committee for a second review. Approximately 52,000 low-income Granite Staters rely on expanded Medicaid for access to health care, and the State Legislature must reauthorize the program for it to continue beyond the end of this year.